Advertisement
Search
Latest Feature
Latest Episode
Latest Comments
Mulberry Street
A deadly infection attacks Manhattan, borne from the hordes of mutant rats hidden away in the depths of the subway tunnels. As the victims are bit, they begin to transform into monstrous rat-like mutants. A group of apartment house tenants living in the lower class area of the island are forced to band together to protect their homes.
“Mulberry Street”, shot in 2006 and an entrant in the 2007 After Dark Film Fest looks to be a unique scare from the basic plot surmise. Mutant rats and a plague gone wild, both elements that we haven’t seen in the theaters for some time. As we dig into the many layers contained within the movie, we unfortunately discover that it’s not quite as unique as they would leave you to believe. In it’s simplest form, “Mulberry Street” is your basic zombie attack formula with rats substituting for the undead.
The strong point of “Mulberry Street” is the character development. The movie opens on Clutch, the bonafied good guy of the Mulberry St. apartment complex. Down to earth, he stops to share a kind word or a helping hand to everybody he meets. As he gets home and begins to clean up from his morning jog, he checks his answering machine to hear his daughter is coming home from the army. In this quick five minute montage, Director Jim Mickle manages to fully paint this character and leave him fully developed in an economical amount of time.
We know he’s going to be the one to go back and help somebody when the shit hits the fan, we know he’s going to be the tough guy, we know he’s going to sacrifice everything to save his daughter. His daughter Casey is developed in much the same way. We see her in the train station as she concentrates on the scars she received in her service to the country; we know by this that she is our tragic hero wanting nothing but the comforts of home after a traumatic tour of duty only to have it ripped away from her. In this department, “Mulberry Street” excels. The problems arise in the pacing and plot as it advances on.
The biggest problem with “Mulberry Street” is that we’ve seen it all before. This has every element of the zombie apocalypse, only with different set dressing. We have the slow outward expansion as we see person after person infected. We have the cluster of people trapped inside a lonely and forlorn domicile as they fend off the waves of mutant attackers. We have the hero and his solitary fight across a war torn city sacrificing himself to save someone he hardly knows. All of the zombie tropes are in attendance. Couple this with a crawling pace and the movie becomes a bit of a chore to get through towards the end of the second act.
This sounds like I hated this movie a lot which is really not the case. While many elements were derivative of other movies, they did a fine job with what they had. The characters were believable and endearing, the action was handle nicely when it did appear and there was some good gore and makeup effects. In this day and age it just felt like a ‘been there done that’ situation.
The rat people were nicely done however, and there was varying degrees of mutation that were well done without CGI effects. Latex and kayro syrup played well as we saw the ratlike creatures brought to life. While the creatures out in the open of Manhattan weren’t much to be scared of, once they entered the confines of the Mulberry Street tenement they became quite frightening indeed. As a matter of fact, if they would have concentrated the majority of the movie on the deadly mutants as they crawled through the walls and crawlspaces of the apartment like their four legged counterparts, this movie would have been all the better for it. In act three, as the creatures broke through the locked doors and began to sweep through the dark hallways of the building, the horror became palpable and well done. Otherwise, it was kind of boring.
“Mulberry Street” is a decent movie, especially given its indie nature and budget. The problem arises when you buy into the hype that it's something new and original. If you can get past these misconceptions you’ll be in for a decent scare; otherwise it’s just zombie movie x without the zombies.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page








Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Really enjoyed this one
Saw this as part of After Dark last year, and it was the only one of the three films that I saw that was worth seeing. I agree with your points here for the most part, but I would go (and did go in my review that I'm not spending time to find right now) further in singing this film's praises.
This is pretty standard zombie stuff -- just done really well. I thought the cinematography was as good as you'll find in a low budget horror film, and the acting was also top notch considering the budget. Overall, I thought the director did a terrific job of knowing his limits and crafting a nice little film. I went into this thing with zero hype, so I was very, very pleased. I'd give it a solid recommend to any horror fan, and particularly those who like atmospheric zombie stuff.
end
How did you feel about the end? It a generic zombie movie ending that to me felt tacked on for no real reason other than it was the typical ending to a zombie movie.
Overall, I wasn't impressed with the actual movie but I was very impressed with the films makers. I thought this just wasn't a very good movie, as opposite to it being a bad low budget movie (does that make sense?).
"I like it when they lie still like that."
I can't even remember what
I can't even remember what happens at the end-end, as in what solves the problem, but I thought the rooftop stuff was a nice way of handling the subject matter.
I guess the over-arching point that I was trying to make, which sort of echoes what you're saying, is that these filmmakers clearly didn't have much money, but they found a way to make a film that tackled a bigger subject on a doable scale. Lots of times that kind of thing falls flat, but I thought it worked here. I wouldn't say this is a great, must-see film, but it's far better than it had any right to be, and sometimes that's enough to make something worth seeing (at least in my book).
clarification
yeah I came out of the theater interested in seeing what the filmmakers pulled off with a real budget but unimpressed by the actual film they had made.
There was no solving of the problem, other than the priest on the street randomly being cured with no explanation. I was more refering to the army just randomly killing the daughter for no reason, other than it's what's expected from the army in a zombie movie.
"I like it when they lie still like that."
Meh
I guess I liked Mulberry Street, but it's pretty forgettable.
I too enjoyed this movie (I
I too enjoyed this movie (I think I bought it based on Jon's review and on Rue Morgue's article about it). While it does follow the typical zombie movie I had a personal interest because it's a New York story and being a New Yorker I can always appreciate when a director can capture the city well on film. I was also fascinated at how will it was done with such limited resources. They used one apartment (the writer's actual apartment) and redressed it for almost every character's apartment! That was pretty cool.
It was definitely one of the better after dark films and a decent indie horror flick.
-Tanya
Catchin' bullets with her teeth since 1977