The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

mummy_tomb_of_the_dragon_emperor.jpg
5/10
Pros: 
Jet Li
Fight Scenes
Plot
Cons: 
CGI Mummy
Cartoonish Yeti's
No need for another sequel
director: 
Rob Cohen
Year: 
2008
MPAA Rating: 
PG-13
Company: 
Universal Pictures
caps: 
Did You Know?: 
Rachel Weisz announced that she will not be reprising her role of Evelyn due to issues with the screenplay.
The tomb of the Dragon Emperor with its Terracotta warriors is inspired by the real-life tomb of the first emperor of the Qin Dynasty. The mausoleum is located in Xi'an, China.
Luke Ford, who plays the son Alex, was born in 1981 and is only 13 years younger than Fraser and 14 years younger than Bello.
August 1, 2008

In 1924, Rick O’Connell unleashed the mummy of Imhotep while on an archeological dig in Egypt. In 1933 he shipped Imhotep’s corpse to a London museum, only to awaken him once again! It’s now 1947 at the tail end of World War II. Rick and his wife Evelyn have retired from the archeological adventure trade for a quiet life on their large English estate.

Queue their 20 something year old son Alex. Alex is supposed to be a college student studying for his future. That’s what his parents think anyways. In actuality he’s followed in his parents footsteps, adventuring throughout China in search of the tomb of Emperor Han and his Terra Cotta Army. Asked to escort a stolen artifact back to China, Rick and Evelyn soon find out that Alex isn’t in college anymore, and that he’s in fact found the lost Emperor of China. Too bad for them, Emperor Han has some followers still alive and set on bringing him back to life!

The “Mummy” franchise seemed to reach its logical conclusion back in 2001 when “The Mummy Returns” hit screens. The story involving Imhotep had reached a logical conclusion (both times) and while mildly fun, the story was told. So it was with great confusion that I bought my ticket to “The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Empire”. Some seven years after the last entry, I wasn’t quite sure who exactly was clamoring for another mummy movie. Sure, I enjoyed the first two for what they were; relatively mindless popcorn flicks packed with action and humor. Hell, I even enjoy Brendan Frasier for the most part and I hadn’t seen him in anything for awhile, so I was down with that too. Regardless, I still wasn’t quite sure what prompted a “Mummy 3”. As it turns out, the filmmakers weren’t quite sure why they were doing it either.

“Mummy 3” (because it’s shorter) follows the formula set by the first two movies to a T. They movie is packed with heavy action scenes, some history of how the mummy became ‘The Mummy’, and many many ham handed jokes sprinkled throughout. With the addition of Jet Li as Emperor Han, the action scenes became that much better, even if he was under used. Had they used Jet Li more? It probably would have been an even better movie.

Instead, we get a CGI clay golem that’s modeled loosely after Jet Li stomping around stiffly shooting fireballs. I’m not a hater of CGI; I quite like it when used right and in moderation. The fireballs and elemental effects put to use by Emperor Han would have been great, as long as they were being thrown about by Jet Li, not his computerized look alike. Only showing up in the non action sequences for the history lessons, as well as some action in the final scenes of the movie, he was great in these. He would have been great if they would have worked him in throughout as well.

The plot behind “Mummy 3” is what you would expect. The plot holes are negligible and the fanciful aspects of the story are out in left field as far as fanciful goes. With the inclusion of protective Yeti’s and the lost city of Shangri-La, the movie teeters on ridiculous yet still manages to stay watchable. After all, we’re watching a movie where Mummy’s come to life after centuries of death. A little bit of craziness is acceptable.

Outside of the giant Yeti’s (Which were quite awesome despite their cheesiness), the plot is acceptable and advances as one would expect in a knock off “Indy Jones” franchise. Managing to laugh at themselves from time to time, they work in nice little jabs referencing the different actress playing Evelyn among other small things. On the action side, which is what the movie is all about, “Mummy 3” managed to shine despite the stiffly moving CGI bad guy. Taking advantage of the martial arts skills of their newest stars, the fight scenes have taken on a new flair that helps to bring out a new brand of excitement. Copious amounts of ‘wire fu’ is thrown in adding to the fantastical nature of the film. The history side of the movie is well fleshed out too as they make use of the Terra Cotta Army as well as the Great Wall of China.

One of my biggest issues with this iteration of the “Mummy” franchise was buying into the fact that Brendan Frasier has a 20 something year old son. The man is only 40 and still looks pretty youthful; his son didn’t look like he was that far apart from him in years. With this being a major plot point, it makes it hard to relate to the story as you puzzle throughout. Frasier had some issues too as his Rick O’Connell character failed to come across as smooth as he had in his former outings. Feeling somewhat forced at times, too heavy at others, Frasier's performance felt like an actor trying on an old suit that he seems to have out grown.

Maria Bello subbing in for Rachel Weisz as his wife Evelyn had big shoes to fill. Filling a role that had been acted by some one else on two separate occasions can be tough, but Bello handled it well. So well in fact, that I didn’t realize it was her until I checked after the film! Granted, she did not come across as the Evelyn of old, more of an entirely new Evelyn. However, with her brunette tresses and fake British accent, she managed to disappear completely into the role disguising herself quite well. As mentioned previously, Jet Li was fine for his role as the ambitious Emperor Han and even enjoyable when he was on screen; my only wish was that they used him more. Michelle Yeoh suffered much the same fate; she wasn’t used as much as she could have been but was fine when she did appear on screen. Her lack of use fit better with the plot however and wasn’t as glaring as the misuse of Jet Li.

“The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor” is not a ground breaking movie by any means, and still falls short of the levels of the first two movies of the franchise. Despite this, it still makes for an enjoyable night at the movie munching away at your bucket of popcorn. It’s not a summer blockbuster, but it is the summer action flick that you would expect. A movie that you could easily wait to watch until it shows up on DVD, there are still worse movies you could spend your money on at the theater.

Christine's picture

The Son

That was my biggest issue in just watching the previews. Why does Frasier have an adult son?!?!
In other news,
most amusing thing I've ever seen.

Misfit24's picture

Holy shit!!! Why?

This sequel came out like 7 years too late and I just can't buy Maria Bello as Rachel Weisz. I saw this on a double bill with Hellboy2 at a drive in up in new brunswick canada and fell asleep during this fucking movie. I was very disapointed after watching the amazing but flawed Hellboy 2, to see this pile of bullshit. Wtf was up with the yeti's? why did they need to add that? Just to pound home the fact they were in the Himalaya's.

Didn't jet Li say like a couple years ago say he was retiring? why the fuck is he still in movies? I remembered hearing that on some entertainment show and then he came out with like 5 new movies that year.

Why the fuck does Brendan Fraiser still have a career? Hasn't he made enough goddamn shitty flops for hollywood to stop putting him in big name movies?

I think he's overdue for the overaged washed up pretty boy actors graveyard where he's reduced to being in no name productions of shitty direct to video films.

Casey's picture

haha

"I think he's overdue for the overaged washed up pretty boy actors graveyard where he's reduced to being in no name productions of shitty direct to video films."

Isn't that pretty much what this is aside from the fact they tried to milk it for a bit of box office? I don't think they ever tried to declare this overly serious. Cash in & a re-try at a career for Frasier!

That said, I don't mind Frasier in small doses.

Misfit24's picture

He's not that bad I guess

He's not that bad of an actor but I think his fame and personality has alot to do with the 90s as like other actors like Tim allen and a handfull that made some big name movies in the 2000's.

I really liked him in Airheads and thats about it. I just don't think he has what it takes to pull a huge crowd with his personality, now if you want to talk about some direct to video films? I'm sure he could find some good projects that he might actually want to do.

The whole time I was watching this movie and saw a scene with him in it, he looked just bored and could not care less about his performance in this movie. Everyone was on auto pilot for this one and as far as serious movies go? I don't have to watch a serious movie to be entertained but over the top just stupidity and insulting my intelligence won't keep my eyes glued to the screen.

Misfit24's picture

Yeah I know why Rachel Weisz wasn't in this one

Yeah she had problems with the screenplay because it was a fucking mummy movie!!!! hahahaha