To start off, let me say that my only experience with "Masters of Horror" was John Carpenter's "Cigarette Burns". I enjoyed it, although I didn't think it was anything spectacular. A lot of fans have told me that was the best episode of all two seasons, which to me wasn't very encouraging for "Fear Itself". The key advantage that having the show on Showtime affords you, is that even the bad episodes can throw in some gore and a boob or two and up the enjoyment level considerably. So, how did NBC fare without that leisure? In my opinion, not very good.
I was very excited for this show. I think it was just the idea of horror being on national television again, as well as the fact that the series is running during the summer that just seemed right to me. This first episode, "Sacrifice", basically deals with a group of thieves who have to hole up in a remote commune (during winter?) inhabited by three sexy sisters. Of course, the sisters end up being eeeeeevil, and we discover about half way through that they're hiding some sort of secret.
I'll let the other guys describe what they thought about specifics of the episode, but let me just give you my general problem with the way this is being done. For me, the main draw is the fact that you have (in theory) good horror directors behind each episode. So, one could assume that each episode should have a distinct look and feel. This unfortunately, is not true. Presumably because of time and money constraints, this episode (and presumably, the rest) ended up looking like a generic cop drama with some horror thrown in. The restraints on the directors really drain any chance they have of infusing their personality, which to me is the entire point. Remember those old "Tales From the Darkside" episodes from the 80's? They were usually directed by Joe Nobody, but give the camera a soft focus and some low lighting and that will go a long way towards creating atmosphere. This is glossy, uninspired stuff at best.
I guess I enjoyed it, slightly. It was tough to really get into it when there were commercials every 5 minutes. That said, this is a perfect example of where the lack of censorship over at Showtime might have helped save a dull story. They did manage to actually cram more blood in than you'll see in "Prom Night" though, so I've got to give them credit for that. The creature design on the "Vampire" was also decent, although suspiciously we never see the thing on screen for more than a split second (damn shaky cam).
So, overall I give this a poor rating. I'm thinking that next time I'll have to down a few beers before the show... I'm guessing that will help. And I will keep watching, at least for the time being, if for no other reason than I'm interested to see how this experiment turns out. However, one would think that they would choose to lead with their best episode straight out of the gate. If that's the case, we're in trouble.
For the premier of a new series, and the relaunch of a on old, I give it a resounding 'eh, not bad'.
Pacing was slow over all, but managed to stay coherent and keep you guessing throughout. It was actually a plot I wasn't able to guess straight away so I give it props for that. Sadly, it could have been better if it didn't turn out to be such an over done plot device. I was so hoping for "Ginger Snaps: The Redux"; instead it was "Nosferatu: Part Deux". It's pretty hard to give a shit about vampires these days.
At least it was the ugly animal kind and not the foo-foo Tom Cruise kind. All of us have said that we liked the animal qualities of the "30 Days of Night" vamps, and this is what we got. In the short shaky glimpses we got of him, there was no question that this critter was not 'normal'.
I found the plot of these criminals a bit hard to follow; we're thrown into them making a get away and one of them shot. We never really find out what they were doing or why. I found this overall distracting because I spent the entire hour wondering just what the hell they've been up to. All we get is a hint with a duffel bag full of guns and Mr. head bad guy dual wielding Uzi's. (With no kickback, natch.)
The kickoff of "Fear Itself" is not a total failure by any means, it was just sort of...limp. It was nice to see Rachel Miner thrown in there as she has a budding scream cream career in the works and brings a slight bit of credibility to the project. ("Penny Dreadful", "Tooth and Nail") The rest of the cast was pretty lackluster, all though I did get a kick out of the dopey Lemmon. I do feel kind of sorry for the dude that was shot because his big acting break was laying around and moaning a lot.
I'm ready for Episode 2 and see how it turns out. I'm biased though because I love me some cheesy Eric Roberts acting and the previews look like it will be chock full!
In a more perfect world, "The Sacrifice" would have been called "Bunch of Random Horror Cliches with Two-Fisted Uzi Guy." I wonder why they didn't go with that title instead?
Honestly though, the Fear Itself launch was about 40% better than I expected. It required epic levels of disbelief suspension, but otherwise there was plenty to enjoy. You had the hot sisters dressed in 18th century clothes (awesome). There was the vaguely Nosferatu-looking vampire thing (cool-ish). And there were even a handful of creepy or at least interesting shots (I'd list the lip-sewing and the hanging-upside-down blood dripping). "The Sacrifice" certainly ranked above some of the "Masters of Horror" episodes, but in reality, this thing would have been much more watchable had it been shot for Showtime instead of network.
Probably my favorite moment of toned-down violence came in the penultimate scene where the two remaining survivors used kerosene to kill the vampire. The "money shot"—which in any half-way decent, STV release would have been gory as all get out or at least have a flaming dude running around—featured, and I wish I was lying, a door that had been set on fire. Now, clearly "Fear Itself" is not designed for the hardcore horror junkies, but even regular folks who were expecting a "Law and Order" at 10pm and got this instead would have thought that was pretty wussy. I'm interested to hear what other folks thought. For right now, I'll say that I'm ready to give episode two a chance.
Feel free to tell us what you thought in the comments!
Theme song
Submitted by Casey on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 16:06.I wanted to add, the opening theme was done by Serj Tankian. I just want it to be said here that Serj Tankian with System of a Down? A-ok. Serj Tankian by himself? Not so much.
Theme
Submitted by Eric on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 16:30.I liked it alright.
The music in the episode was terrible generic "horror" music though. Another drawback of having time and money constraints. I'd be willing to bet it's the same generic shit all season.
Fear Itself..
Submitted by head_shot on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 17:30.I didn't mind it too much, I was just happy to see something on TV that I felt like watching. Sure some of it was not as gory as some would like, but I didn't mind the "Flaming door" you have to remember that they trapped the vampire in the pit with the door! So how would you explain a dude running around on fire? I felt it worked.
As for this being the first Episode, I had read that the first was supposed to be one called the "Feeder". I wonder why they pulled that in favor of this one? Did they feel it was weak? If so we might be in trouble. Anyfuck I'll be sitting on my ass with a Jack and Water every Thursday night watching till they pull it.
Aim for the head-!!
Flaming door
Submitted by Eric on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 18:32.The flaming door part didn't bother me as much as the fact that she poured gas all over the top of the door, instead of leaning down and pouring it directly down the holes he made.
I didn't need it to be more gory necessarily, just more interesting. There have been plenty of films to come out lately that show how intensity can be achieved without overt violence. I think these directors need to try and go in that direction.
Gore and Boobs
Submitted by John Shelton on Sun, 06/08/2008 - 17:46.I haven't seen Fear Itself yet, but from what you guys describe it does sound like a continuation of Masters of Horror- mostly crap with the possibility of an occasional gem. I for was actually hoping that toning things down for network TV would improve the show.
I like gore and boobs as much as anybody, but I've seen enough of both that they don't really do much to change my feelings about a TV show/movie. Back in the 80s gore and boobs might have been hard to find (for 12-year-old me, at least) but I've got the internet now, y'know.
With MOH, all too often it seemed like they tried to cover up the lack of interesting stories or genuine thrills with gore and boobs. Especially when we're dealing with anthology horror, I'll take a well-crafted psychological scare or a clever story over yet another guy getting his guts munched or some random starlet getting her tits out any day of the week.