Advertisement
Latest Feature
Coming Soon
Latest Episode
Latest Comments
Advertisement
The Mondokey Hole
Deep thoughts with the oldest nerd on the block.
Hancock Mini Review
Last night I found myself in attendance for a pre-screening for Will Smith's latest flick, "Hancock". As I head into this mini write up, I want to make a point; I went into "Hancock" with little to no prior knowledge or expectations. The trailers have been floating about out there for awhile, I've watched them once or twice, but honestly I never paid much attention.
For those not in the know, "Hancock" is a super hero story surrounding the main character John Hancock played by Will Smith. Mr. Hancock is a blight on society; he's an alcoholic, homeless and happens to have super powers. He's done what he can to help out with crimes occurring around L.A. but he's not very good about at it. Causing millions of dollars to the city, the general populace tends to hate him. Enter Ray Embry, played by Jason Bateman, a local PR Agent who find himself facing certain doom as he's stuck on a train track. Hancock saves his life and Embry wants to pay him back. He also thinks some PR training and spin control will do wonders for the man's self esteem. Together they set out to reform this super bum into a super hero that the populace loves and admires.
As "Hancock" prepares for it's long weekend opening, it faces a possible insurmountable hurdle; preconception. As you flit about the internet, the quality of many movies is decided upon the trailers alone. For "Hancock" this has been more prevalent that many in recent years. I myself, along with thousands of others, was prepared for the worst. Most expect nothing more than hammy Will Smith acting like a drunken hobo and many catch phrases such as 'Welcome to ERF!’ While the first half of the movie does in fact fit this preconception, it's not to heavy handed, provides some good laughs, is generally slightly annoying but bearable. The trailers however, at least the ones that I've watched, are misleading; at the half way point "Hancock" turns the corner into a serious action movie, a solid super hero origin story, and in general a hell of a lot of fun.
The key to enjoying "Hancock" is remembering the fact that it's a pure origin story. It's also an original origin story; instead of trying to opt in a long existing coming book yarn and conforming it to a new format, they've set out to create an entirely new hero with zero back story. The first half of the film that focuses on the down and out hero is necessary. We don't know where he's coming from, we don't know who he is. Instead of ret conning (Thanks Schnaars!) a story of hardship and trauma into an existing story line, we're watching it develop from the beginning. Act 2 introduces us to the first appearance of the hero. He reluctantly sets to help out the populace in a non destructive and sober way. He's nervous, he's a bit cocky, he's emerged from the origin ashes. Act 3 gives us a taste the full blown hero mode and just how powerful he is. It also returns full circle to give us a full dose of origin story to eventually culminate in a full blown super hero in the final five minutes of film. What excites me over this formula is simple; we're given a brand new super hero that we know nothing about. Over the course of the movie we watch this hero evolve into a full blown hero. The movie is of course left wide open for sequels and the chance of a franchise super stardom. The beauty is, we've gotten the character development done in this first movie; number 2 is going to be some pretty solid ass kicking action.
"Hancock" has it's faults. Many are going to have a hard time getting over Smith's schtick in the first act of the movie. Honestly though, it's not as over the top as "ID4" and the like. There are also some scenes in the second act that could use some serious editing. There are lulls in the flow here that may cause you to glance at your watch a time or two, but the third act will more than make up for it. There is a Shyamalan-esque twist closing out the second act that completely caught me off guard. This twist is what makes the movie turn the corner from mediocre to really good for a super hero origin story. Ultimately, "Hancock" is going to shed some new light on 'super heroes' in general, and that's not a bad thing. Comic Book purists may disagree but for me, it worked well.
I myself will give "Hancock" a 7 out of 10. Solid story if you give a chance and in all honesty, I really enjoyed myself over all.
Will Smith haters though? Yah, you're probably not going to like it. But, sometimes parents just don't understand.
- Casey's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page









I can think of about 1000
I can think of about 1000 people that would make a better homeless superhero, but I may give this a netflix rental or a watch at the dollar theater in Rochester.
Eh
I don't get all the Will Smith hate. I thought he was pretty solid in this. I mean, I'd imagine the back up plan would have been somebody like Tim Allen
Hnacock
I think it's interesting that we've gotten to the point where an original superhero movie, ie not based on an actual comicbook, can be considered a big summer tentpole movie.
"I like it when they lie still like that."
Will Smith Hate
From what I understand, the original script for this was actually very dark and edgy. Then they cast Will Smith in the film, and it turns into something altogether different. Plus, it had came out that the film had to be submitted to the MPAA two or three times to get a PG-13, so the idea was to water it down from the start.
The first time I saw this trailer, I literally threw my hands over my mouth in horror. It may have some decent action, but I just can't get behind this one.
Random Tie In!
David Mattey, who played Toxie in Citizen Toxie, is featured on the front page of the newspaper I work at because of his role as "Man Mountain" in Hancock! Small world!
I liked it
Sorry, but I did. I thought it was different, adding something new to the Super Hero movie genre. I have no problem with Will Smith, I'm a take him or leave him kinda gal so I thought he was good in this role.
From my previous experience with superhero movies the first act is generally the origin story, but because it was moved and cut down the movie seemed to zip past, which was a nice change.
However in doing that they did leave the story a little bit in tatters, but there is a reason for that. 5 weeks before the release they did major re-shoots because the movie was given an R rating and they panicked - sorry Eric not really Will Smiths doing.
I would say give it a go, you might be supprised like I was and actually like it!
Not quite what I meant
I didn't mean it was Will Smith's fault as in he did it himself, I'm just saying that by hiring Will Smith, the producer's were making a strong statement about what kind of movie they were making. If you were really trying to make an edgy R rated superhero movie, you wouldn't cast Will Smith in the first place. That's all I'm saying.
I guess so, now I think
I guess so, now I think about it. I Am Legend wasn't R was it? It was only a 15 here so I would assume it wasn't. I suppose using the guy from Men In Black etc dosen't give the message of a gritty superhero.
I really liked this movie.
I really liked this movie. The idea they had of the super heroes was interesting. And Will Smith did a good job in this. Most people forget that the man can actually act when given the right project. I mean look at the first part of I AM LEGEND. His only costar was a dog and he did great. But when he starts reciting SHREK it just goes to hell.
But he was great in this movie. If people are turned off by him in the first act then I have to ask "How is a hobo super hero supposed to act?" because really that is the way I would imagine it in my head if I heard HOBO SUPERHERO.
The movie does have it's dark moments. It really sort of plays on the fact that he is alone in this world and some other spoilerish stuff that I won't go into really make you feel for him. Yeah they funned it up so they could get a PG13 rating but again not all PG13 movies are bad. I say if you're a fan of super hero movies this is one to check out. You don't have to know squat before going in and if anything just go to see Daeg Faerch being thrown into the air and crying like a little girl. Michael Myers my ass.
www.drunkenzombie.com
ehh Hancock
Eric, I have to look up the preproduction of Hancock, because I am really intrigued by what it could have been if it was an R- Rated superhero movie, without Will Smith.
I saw it last week, and I wasn't really impressed. They mention it on the news page, when you sign into Yahoo. "They say it has a twist which splits critics and Audience members down the middle", Unfortunately, I guessed the twist pretty early on.
I am not bragging. I am by no means any more clever than any other moviegoers, I just put things together from watching the trailers. I think I mentioned this in my The Happening review, where you pretty much see everything in the trailer of a film. In Hancock (SPOILER ALERT) you knew one of the main characters was going to have the same powers as Will Smith, because there is a fight scene between two super powered people in the trailer.
I feel like every twist nowadays is really ruined by the trailers, and even the twenty second tv spots.
Ok, so what the hell does this have to do with my review of it? Well, I gotta say, that I spent most of the time in the first sixty percent of the film trying to figure out what was Hancock's origin, and which other main character it tied in with, instead of giving a shit about what was going on in the actual movie.
Hancock was like Get Smart (god I see alot of shit films).you saw the jokes a mile a way, and because of that you just wanted to get through the film to make fun of it.
Yeah, the origin was cool, and the twist made the movie alot more interesting, but why not make it a completely dramatic film, instead of throwing in truly lame ass jokes?
I also thought it was interesting that this movie was made by the same guy who made Very Bad Things.